<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.kobek.com: the wonderful and frightening world of jarett kobek &#187; bob dylan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kobek.com/category/bob-dylan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kobek.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:39:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>European Psychedelic Art &#8212; Bob Dylan</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2008/05/29/european-psychedelic-art-bob-dylan/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2008/05/29/european-psychedelic-art-bob-dylan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yr guess good as mine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://blog.kobek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/47.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-815" title="his satanic majestie\'s rekewezts" src="http://blog.kobek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/47.jpg" alt="" width="344" height="482" /></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2008/05/29/european-psychedelic-art-bob-dylan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lyrics to Bob Dylan&#039;s &quot;I&#039;m Not There (1956)&quot;</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/21/lyrics-to-bob-dylans-im-not-there-1956/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/21/lyrics-to-bob-dylans-im-not-there-1956/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/21/lyrics-to-bob-dylans-im-not-there-1956/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each of the last few years has had a strange cycle of Bob Dylan frenzy, generally culminating in a Significant Fall release. 2007 is no different and November offers Todd Haynes&#8217;s gimmicky biopic I&#8217;m Not There. It&#8217;s hard to imagine &#8230; <a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/21/lyrics-to-bob-dylans-im-not-there-1956/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each of the last few years has had a strange cycle of Bob Dylan frenzy, generally culminating in a Significant Fall release. 2007 is no different and November offers Todd Haynes&#8217;s gimmicky biopic <em>I&#8217;m Not There</em>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to imagine a less necessary work. Dylan has long been a master of destroying his public persona through the medium of film.  Remember: this is the man who gave us <em>Eat the Document, Renaldo and Clara, Hearts of Fire </em>and<em> Masked and Anonymous.</em> Rumor has it that Dylan kicked around the idea of an adaptation of &#8220;Rosemary, Lily, and the Jack of Hearts&#8221; and went so far to commission a screenplay. God. If only.</p>
<p>Anyway, the only significant thing to come from Haynes&#8217;s project is the commercial release of Dylan&#8217;s &#8220;I&#8217;m Not There (1956)&#8221; on the film&#8217;s soundtrack. This song was recorded by  Dylan and The Hawkes/The Band during the so-called Basement Tapes sessions, and has been available previously only through bootlegging.</p>
<p>Having heard this news, I went looking for internet transcriptions of the song. Each one that I found was atrocious.  As such, I&#8217;ve gone ahead and put together what I think is about the most reasonable and accurate rendering of the lyrics that can be found, along with explanations of the weirder lines. Words and phrases surrounded by double question marks indicate unresolved confusion on my part. Lines followed by asterisks indicate firm judgment as to what&#8217;s being said. Here:</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m Not There (1956)&#8221;<br />
Bob Dylan</p>
<p>1 Ev&#8217;ry thing&#8217;s all right<br />
2 And then she&#8217;s all the time<br />
3 In my neighborhood<br />
4 She cried both day and night<br />
5 I know it because it was there</p>
<p>6 It&#8217;s a milestone but<br />
7 She down on her luck<br />
8 And she day makes her lone (*)<br />
9 And but ??to make too hard to buck??<br />
10 I be then (*)</p>
<p>11 I believe where she stopping<br />
12 If she wants time to care<br />
13 I believe that she&#8217;d<br />
14 Look upon deciding to care<br />
15 And I go by The Lord in ways (*)<br />
16 She&#8217;s on my way<br />
17 But I don&#8217;t belong there</p>
<p>18 No, I don&#8217;t belong to her<br />
19 I don&#8217;t belong to ev&#8217;rybody (*)<br />
20 She&#8217;s my prize-foresaken angel<br />
21 But she don&#8217;t hear me cry<br />
22 She&#8217;s a long hearted mystic<br />
23 And she ??dare?? carry on<br />
24 When I&#8217;m there she&#8217;s all right<br />
25 But when she&#8217;s not when I&#8217;m gone</p>
<p>26 Heaven knows that the answer<br />
27 She&#8217;s don&#8217;t calling no one<br />
28 She&#8217;s the way, a sailing beauty<br />
29 For she&#8217;s mine, for the one<br />
30 And I lost her, hesitation (*)<br />
31 By temptation less it runs<br />
32 But she don&#8217;t holler me (*)<br />
33 But I&#8217;m not there I&#8217;m gone</p>
<p>34 Now I&#8217;ve cried tonight<br />
35 Like I cried the night before<br />
36 And I&#8217;m leased on the highs<br />
37 But I dream about the door<br />
38 So long, she&#8217;s foresaken<br />
39 By fate, worse to tell<br />
40 It don&#8217;t hang ??proclamation??<br />
41 She smiles fare thee well</p>
<p>42 Now I went out ??(undecipherable)??<br />
43 I was born to love her<br />
44 But she knows that the kingdom<br />
45 Weighs so high above her<br />
46 And I run, but I race<br />
47 But it&#8217;s not to fast to ??slim??<br />
48 But I don&#8217;t perceive her<br />
49 I&#8217;m not there I&#8217;m gone</p>
<p>50 Well it&#8217;s all about diffusion (*)<br />
51 As I cry for her veil<br />
52 I don&#8217;t need anybody now<br />
53 Beside me to tell<br />
54 And it&#8217;s all affirmation (*)<br />
55 I recede but it&#8217;s not (*)<br />
56 She&#8217;s a ??lone hearted?? beauty<br />
57 But she gone like the spot<br />
58 And she want</p>
<p>59 Yes, she&#8217;s gone like the radio (*)<br />
60 That shining yesterday<br />
61 But now she&#8217;s a-home beside me<br />
62 And I&#8217;d like to here to stay<br />
63 She&#8217;s a bone forsaken beauty<br />
64 And it&#8217;s dont trust anyone<br />
65 And I wish I was beside her<br />
66 But I&#8217;m not there I&#8217;m gone</p>
<p>67 Well it&#8217;s too hard to stake-in (*)<br />
68 And I don&#8217;t far believe<br />
69 It&#8217;s ??all bag?? for to musing<br />
70 But she&#8217;s hard, too hard to leave<br />
71 It&#8217;s alone, it&#8217;s a crime<br />
72 The way she won&#8217;t be around<br />
73 But she told for to hatred<br />
74 But this ??long forsaken?? clown</p>
<p>75 Yes I believe that its rightful<br />
76 Oh I believe it in my mind<br />
77 I been told like I said<br />
78 When I before carry on the grind<br />
79 And she&#8217;s on bet to told her (*)<br />
80 Like I said, carry on<br />
81 I wish I was there to help her<br />
82 But I&#8217;m not there I&#8217;m gone</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p>8. &#8220;makes her lone.&#8221; Lonely would be better, but alas, that ain&#8217;t what the man sang. The -ly suffix is dropped.<br />
9. Fairly certain that &#8220;to make too hard to buck&#8221; is accurate but can&#8217;t be sure.<br />
10.  &#8220;I be then&#8221; is what&#8217;s sung. Given the structure of the other verses mostly ending with some variation of &#8220;I&#8217;m Not There,&#8221; it&#8217;s possible that this was improvisation gone awry.<br />
15. 95% certain  this line ends &#8220;in ways.&#8221;<br />
19. Other transcriptions have Dylan singing &#8220;to anybody.&#8221; An accurate listen offers &#8220;ev&#8217;rybody,&#8221; a contraction used throughout his work in the 1960s and at the beginning of this song.<br />
23. &#8220;dare&#8221; seems reasonable here, but isn&#8217;t the sound being made. <strong>Update</strong>: Sam Tregar suggests &#8220;deign.&#8221; It&#8217;s closer than dare, actually, but still not right.<br />
30. I&#8217;m willing to render the final word as &#8220;hesitation&#8221; because this sounds more like a vocal stumble than a nonsense placeholder.<br />
32. &#8220;Holler&#8221; sounds closest. Could be something else but I&#8217;m hard pressed to say what.<br />
40. &#8220;Proclamation&#8221; is how everyone else transcribes this. I can&#8217;t tell.<br />
42. Absolutely no idea.<br />
47. Absolutely no idea, but it does sound a lot like &#8220;slim.&#8221;<br />
50. A rare instance of a complex idea tracking from one line to the next. Dylan makes a sound a lot like &#8220;diffusion&#8221; and this makes logical sense, as the next line ends on &#8220;veil.&#8221;<br />
54. &#8220;Affirmation&#8221; sounds right. Could be different. Makes sense with the following line.<br />
55. &#8220;Recede.&#8221; Dylan starts singing &#8220;receive&#8221; and puts an &#8220;-ede&#8221; sound on the end.<br />
56. Best guess.<br />
59. Other renderings have this as &#8220;rainbow&#8221; instead of &#8220;radio.&#8221; Rainbow would be nice, as the next line would then inform this one, but sorry. He sings &#8220;radio.&#8221; Welcome to the world of Bob Dylan.<br />
67. Definitely &#8220;stake-in.&#8221; No idea what it means.<br />
69. Almost certain this line is as rendered. &#8220;All bag&#8221; is too difficult to say for sure, but &#8220;to musing&#8221; sounds right.<br />
74. If anyone knows what kind of clown, please, please, <em>please</em>, email me.<br />
79. An accurate rendering of ungrammatical English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/21/lyrics-to-bob-dylans-im-not-there-1956/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>do you want to make a deal?</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/09/do-you-want-to-make-a-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/09/do-you-want-to-make-a-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/09/do-you-want-to-make-a-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For reasons that I hope will become eventually obvious, for about six months I&#8217;ve had Bob Dylan&#8217;s song &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; on the brain. In itself, Dylan on the brain is not unusual, but the song choice is odd&#8211; &#8230; <a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/09/do-you-want-to-make-a-deal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reasons that I hope will become eventually obvious, for about six months I&#8217;ve had Bob Dylan&#8217;s song &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; on the brain. In itself, Dylan on the brain is not unusual, but the song choice is odd&#8211; I couldn&#8217;t listen to it for about two years, a period that coincided with the dawn of my truly heretical notion that the work from &#8217;64-66 is some of Dylan&#8217;s weakest.</p>
<p>The more that I hear the Thin Wild Mercury, the more Dylan sounds like what he was: a callow jerk in his mid-twenties. Having recently been a callow jerk in his mid-twenties, it&#8217;s a little too familiar. I prefer the work surrounding the period. Perhaps in my mid 30s I&#8217;ll be down on <em>Planet Waves</em><em>. </em>&#8220;I love you more than money!? I love you more than blood? A little touch of your love? I&#8217;m goin&#8217; back to New Orleans and puttin&#8217; on <em>Another Side of</em>, dammit!&#8221; says the Future Self of 2012, just before the Mayan Calendar blows up the world.</p>
<p>Anyway. Back in the late 90s, I had a laugh with my friend <a href="http://sam.tregar.com">Sam Tregar</a>, author of CPAN module <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhtml-template.sourceforge.net%2F&amp;ei=nHTkRpmHG4zCgwPdpOnkDA&amp;usg=AFQjCNGeeI_X-JKDQoX4xOY8pSo-bS0FfQ&amp;sig2=AwjXCtg5Tk6MlHejwb4URw">HTML::Template</a> and its companion book, the rivetingly titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Writing-Perl-Modules-CPAN-Tregar/dp/159059018X/ref=sr_1_1/104-4533330-9423954?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1189375616&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Writing Perl Modules for CPAN</em></a>. The joke was that one should break up with a woman at the exact moment when she informed you that she believed &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; was about her life. The theory being that this association bespoke a deep psychological problem that no amount of Love &amp; Companionship could ever make right. Why would anyone want to be the subject of such a hate filled song? Or willingly admit a narrative similarity between their life and the song&#8217;s (apparent) protagonist?</p>
<p>But hello, part of why people are so nuts over the song is its profound superiority to any other piece of music from the First Rock period. God knows it is the best song of its decade, with a quality that prefigures<a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/"> </a><em><a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/">Blood on the Tracks</a>,</em> an album of songs &amp; lyrics of such astonishing quality that one is tempted to believe that Dylan was being ghosted by God. As with any work of Real Art, &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; bares no real traces of its creation; it feels as though it has always existed, like Dylan (in his own words) &#8220;pulled it out of the air&#8221; and laid it down.</p>
<p>(Fear not, aspiring artists&#8211;&#8221;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; took a lot to laugh and a train to cry. There&#8217;s a very documented history of Dylan struggling in the studio. The <em>Bootleg Series, Vol 1</em> has an outtake of the song in 3/4ths time &amp; accompanied by a harpsichord. So. Masterpieces are always made.)</p>
<p>I think the confusion of &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone&#8221; comes from the often unrecognized fact that the song contains two narratives&#8211; there&#8217;s clearly the very familiar, but never better rendered, venom and bile of Bob Dylan towards an unknown woman who hasn&#8217;t lived up to his (impossible) expectations, which is the A Story of the verses, but then there&#8217;s also the B Story of the chorus. The writing here is incredibly tight; in five repeated lines, Dylan manages to achieve a story as consistent and well rendered as the first, but one that also bleeds into and seemingly informs the A Story. Which is to say: you can listen to the chorus and think it&#8217;s about the same person as the verses.</p>
<p>With that in mind, you start seeing why a lot of people think the song is about themselves. Informed by the A Story, the B Story can be read as a ballad of the open road, of the freedom of being out on your own; it&#8217;s almost as if the chorus functions as a counterpoint to the verses&#8211; okay, yeah, Miss Lonely, you had to make juice with it, but here you go, you&#8217;re away from that darkness now, you&#8217;re out living the hipster dream of 1964, and by the way, how does it feel? The inferred answer being: &#8220;Well, redemptive and pretty good, actually.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue the opposite: that the B Story is, if anything, Bob Dylan&#8217;s address to himself. It&#8217;s a cry of pain in the existential mirror of the Chapter One in a first novel. It&#8217;s about the dark side of the American Dream&#8211; I don&#8217;t mean some HST fantasy where hobo midgets dry hump your leg while you&#8217;re on acid &amp; cops beat you for daring, daring! to dream, but rather what happens when America shrugs and allows you to make it; when you push yourself so far into your own destiny that you&#8217;re forced to realize, oh snap, I done done it and it ain&#8217;t no different. There&#8217;s no direction home because there is no home, and not in some grand delusion of being a pilgrim on the expeditionary road to oblivion, but being so bored &amp; lonely &amp; lowdown that every possible option is exhausted and you can&#8217;t figure out where to go or what to do, because ain&#8217;t it gonna be the same anyway? And how does it feel?</p>
<p>Awful, apparently.</p>
<p>And where do you go?</p>
<p>To a basement, to upstate New York, where you hide out and reincarnate as a 19th Century Mystic, a slightly less gay Walt Whitman. One of the roughs while everyone&#8217;s dressed in ascots &amp; paisley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/09/09/do-you-want-to-make-a-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French-Canadian Kerouac</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/08/26/french-canadian-kerouac/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/08/26/french-canadian-kerouac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/2007/08/26/french-canadian-kerouac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For reasons bizarre &#38; untold, I&#8217;ve been trying to make sacrifices to the Book God via the purchase of  books at full cover, an almost unheard of sin. A few days ago, I acquired the newly released unexpurgated, unedited hardback &#8230; <a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/08/26/french-canadian-kerouac/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reasons bizarre &amp; untold, I&#8217;ve been trying to make sacrifices to the Book God via the purchase of  books at full cover, an almost unheard of sin. A few days ago, I acquired the newly released unexpurgated, unedited hardback of Jack Kerouac&#8217;s <em>Original Scroll </em>of <em>On the Road</em>.  Even now I find this choice inexplicable &amp; can&#8217;t explain my actions&#8211; I have bad feelings towards the work of all the Beats (except Burroughs, and even then I find his 60s work nearly intolerable) but none so much as Kerouac&#8217;s, which I find a mixture of the boring &amp; the offensive.</p>
<p>His personal history&#8211; ah, now there&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>Kerouac was a New England boy made on the mean streets of Lowell, MA. He went to Columbia on a football scholarship&#8211; and while there, fell in with the dissolute crowd of junkies, queers and 8th Avenue hucksters who contributed mightily to the creation of the Writer of Renown. He died a delusional alcoholic, apparently thinking that Allen Ginsberg was a Nazi agent and trying to fight Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s son, but for a while, Kerouac was the American Dream, what another now-deceased American Writer would have described as &#8220;pure Horatio Alger.&#8221; He was also French-Canadian; part of an ethnic group of New England immigrants that are often overlooked and forgotten.</p>
<p>So while there&#8217;s the Mythic Kerouac, there&#8217;s also the Lowell working-class kid who ended up dubiously labeled as a generational spokesman. In previous posts, I&#8217;ve written about poor Bob Dylan, Kerouac&#8217;s heir in this questionable honor. It&#8217;s fascinating that the two midcentury figures saddled with that terrible weight both were of ethnic &amp; family backgrounds as far from the American mainstream as you get could get. (While, of course, remaining a &#8220;White.&#8221;)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten through the 100+ pages of critical apparati of the <em>Original Scroll</em>, but the image on the back of the dustjacket is amazing. The most frequently circulated photos of Kerouac play up a young rough with an indistinct, James Dean glamor. The image in question, coming from later in the man&#8217;s sad life, was chosen, I assume, because it depicts Kerouac holding one of his famous scrolls. Fair enough, but it&#8217;s also the only image I&#8217;ve seen of the man (and admittedly I am no student of his iconography) where his ethnic, social, and geographical origins just spill out all over the picture. You can see Lowell, you can see the French-Canadian, you can see the football scholarship.</p>
<p>A great picture:</p>
<p><a title="kerouac.jpg" href="http://blog.kobek.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/kerouac.jpg"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a title="kerouac.jpg" href="http://blog.kobek.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/kerouac.jpg"><img src="http://blog.kobek.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/kerouac.thumbnail.jpg" alt="kerouac.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/08/26/french-canadian-kerouac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>tangled up in blues</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the Kingdom, it has been long contended that the apogee of American songwriting is found in 4 of the cuts from Bob Dylan&#8217;s Blood on the Tracks. While arguments are had as to which make the list, at least &#8230; <a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout the Kingdom, it has been long contended that the apogee of American songwriting is found in 4 of the cuts from Bob Dylan&#8217;s <em>Blood on the Tracks</em>. While arguments are had as to which make the list, at least two of the songs are set in stone: &#8220;Tangled up in Blue&#8221; and &#8220;Idiot Wind.&#8221; I&#8217;d also throw in &#8220;Up To Me&#8221; (inexplicably kept off the original LP and not released commercially until 1990) and &#8220;Lily, Rosemary, and the Jack of Hearts.&#8221;</p>
<p>None of these are my favorite songs, nor even my favorite Bob Dylan songs. I am, and will always be, a bigger fan of imperfection. Especially<em> </em>when it comes to Bob Dylan, an artist whose mistakes and accidents are always as fascinating as his triumphs and conquests. <em>The Basement Tapes, </em>for instance, with all their glitches, false starts and nonsense lyrics speak more directly to my tastes; but I know well enough that my preferences are subjective and not the final arbiters of quality. It is impossible to deny the awesome and solemn power of the 4 <em>Blood </em>songs. It is as if, for a brief period, God decided that He would write lyrics directly and His instrument would be Bob Dylan.</p>
<p>The songs mark a significant shift in Dylan&#8217;s writing&#8211; gone is the singular phraseology, gone is the unique delivery, gone is the clever word play, gone is the possible social commentary, gone is the humor, gone is the Individual Viewpoint, gone is everything that distinguished Dylan throughout the 60s. And in its place is a vision of reality, a solid, explicable thing of itself, where the people and subjects under discussion as are real as Dylan or you or I. All those silly, one line characters from the long, tedious songs of the 1960s have been discarded and replaced by actual personages.</p>
<p>Dylan&#8217;s brilliance is in the economy with which he achieves this and in the fact that these Monumental Works are still, you know, <em>killer </em>as songs. They transcend their form without breaking it. When compared against Dylan&#8217;s earlier work, they also happen to be an excellent demonstration of the shift from the lyrical to epical that James Joyce writes about in the last part of <em>A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man</em>.</p>
<p>Today, while looking for something else entirely, I came across young men (always the men) distributing videos of themselves performing &#8220;Tangled up in Blue&#8221;. There&#8217;s a certain admirable arrogance to the idea of any joe with a guitar trying to master a song of which Dylan himself lost control immediately after it was recorded, and so I thought I&#8217;d share some of these videos, just to demonstrate that even though you might have the world&#8217;s hottest song, you still gotta be a certain hella kid of performer to pull off a line like, &#8220;Lord knows I&#8217;ve paid some dues gettin&#8217; through.&#8221;</p>
<p>So here goes!</p>
<p><center><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QGmwArzmu6s" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed><br />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0VrhYGAQqp0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed><object height="350" width="425"><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cAD1IzigKlA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed><object height="350" width="425"><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lfEeYRpoeCU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed><object height="350" width="425"><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CF-fEf7R8_U" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed><object height="350" width="425"><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c-7rp2u2EZ4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed>And here&#8217;s the best of them (seriously!)</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zT78NJ4Pe2Y" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/24/tangled-up-in-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Danzig has Bob Dylan&#039;s Disease</title>
		<link>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/13/glenn-danzig-has-bob-dylans-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/13/glenn-danzig-has-bob-dylans-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarett Kobek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn danzig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/13/glenn-danzig-has-bob-dylans-disease/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amongst those who dubiously self-identify as Dylanologists (a stupid term coined by the vile A.J. Weberman, arguably the most loathsome of all 60s counter-culture figures) it has been long recognized that Bob Dylan suffers from a rare form of mental &#8230; <a href="http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/13/glenn-danzig-has-bob-dylans-disease/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amongst those who dubiously self-identify as Dylanologists (a stupid term coined by the vile A.J. Weberman, arguably the most loathsome of all 60s counter-culture figures) it has been long recognized that Bob Dylan suffers from a rare form of mental insanity. This madness, and madness it is, is not listed in the DSM but can be identified by its sole symptom: those with Bob Dylan&#8217;s Disease will, and for no apparent reason, put weak material on officially released albums while hiding simultaneously recorded material of superior quality.</p>
<p>With Dylan, this started early&#8211; &#8220;Mama You Been On My Mind&#8221;, &#8220;Farewell, Angelina&#8221;, and the masterpiece &#8220;She&#8217;s Your Lover Now&#8221;&#8211; and has continued throughout his whole career. Think &#8220;Up To Me&#8221;, &#8220;Abandoned Love&#8221;, and &#8220;Blind Willie McTell&#8221;. The appearance of &#8220;Mississippi&#8221; on <em>Love and Theft</em>, a track originally recorded for <em>Time Out of Mind</em>, makes us wonder if Dylan isn&#8217;t still at his old tricks. (Although it&#8217;s just possible that Dylan may have been in the right, as producer Daniel Lanois reportedly had layered polyrhythmic drumming on the <em>Time </em>original.)</p>
<p>With Tuesday&#8217;s release of <em>The Lost Tracks of Danzig</em>, a 2CD set of outtakes from the history of Glenn Danzig&#8217;s eponymous band, we must report sadly that we have found another sufferer of Bob Dylan&#8217;s Disease. Some of my readers might, of course, wonder if there is any genuine qualitative difference in any of Danzig&#8217;s output&#8211; ain&#8217;t that all just some gol danged heavy metal crap?</p>
<p>Well, no.</p>
<p>Glenn Danzig has had some strange luck&#8211; the Misfits were great, but what in the hell were they? A band so weird that it took suburban kids 15 years to turn them into a cheap psychobilly cliche. Samhain? Well, jeez, I love Samhain but even I can&#8217;t tell you what the heck that was about. And then, yes, finally, Danzig<em>. </em>Again the odd luck held&#8211; the first album was released in &#8217;88, the second in &#8217;90. Both surfed on a wave of accessible, radio friendly metal, getting Glenn Danzig a house in Los Feliz but tarnishing his reputation as a metal goon, something the man&#8217;s endless cock of the walk posturing has done nothing to abate.</p>
<p>Both albums offer a uniquely weird blues based rock structured around a super crunchy guitar sound and The Voice&#8217;s lyrical throwaways on the motifs that have consumed Danzig from, we presume, early adolescence&#8211;  skulls, blackness, blood, demons and women. Then came <em>Danzig III</em>, an album I like, but which really is kind of metal, and then the live album/double-EP that gave us the &#8217;93 single of &#8220;Mother&#8221;,  solidifying forever Glenn Danzig&#8217;s reputation as Metal Dude. The follow-up was <em>Danzig 4p</em>, a great album and the most successful of all of Danzig&#8217;s experiments. (It is also almost certainly the only major label release to reference the Scientology off-shoot The Process Church of the Final Judgment.)</p>
<p>And then came the darkness. With a demonic host of malign and bloody skulls, Danzig fired the band that&#8217;d been with him for all four albums (and was the final Samhain lineup) and made<em> 5: Blackacidevil</em>, an album of Trent Reznor fanfic about three years too late. Then <em>666: Satan&#8217;s Child</em>, and then <em>7: I, Luciferi</em>. The less said of either, the better. 2004 saw a happy return to form with <em>Circle of Snakes</em>. The Voice sounded terrible on the previous two albums, and while weaker with age, it&#8217;s fine on <em>Circle</em>; the major problem being production. For whatever reason, the album is poorly leveled on big systems while sounding just fine on headphones.</p>
<p>And that was supposed to be it: <em>Circle of Snakes </em>was the last album by Danzig, the band. But Glenn Danzig, the man, had a vault full of inverted crosses and unreleased tracks, and he began rumbling about releasing them, and so he has. And I am here to report that <em>The Lost Tracks of Danzig </em>is significantly better than anything since Danzig 4p, and also that Glenn Danzig has Bob Dylan&#8217;s Disease.</p>
<p>The first disc is all Danzig 1-4, and yeah, of course that&#8217;s going to be great. But the second disc has outtakes from 5-7, and they&#8217;re <em>so much </em>better than anything on those albums that unless you accept mental insanity as a defense, it&#8217;s impossible to figure out why they were omitted in favor of the tracks that comprised the original albums.</p>
<p>Music may be the only artform where murdering your darlings constitutes a mistake. That&#8217;s weird, but how else do you explain it? Actual insanity? Monstrous egotism? The total inability to discern one&#8217;s own efforts?</p>
<p>I have no idea! But boy I really like <em>The Lost Tracks of Danzig. </em>This is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kobek.com/2007/07/13/glenn-danzig-has-bob-dylans-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

